VEX
Confession

Finding a Bull: We Had His Number for Three Months Before We Called

They found the right person in eleven days. Then sat on his number for three months. An anonymous first-person account from a Dayton couple.

Most finding-a-bull content addresses the search itself. The criteria, the platforms, the vetting calls, the red flags. Implicit in all of it is the assumption that finding someone suitable is the hard part. For some couples, it is not. The search ends early, the phone call goes well, the fit is obvious. And then something else becomes hard — something no guide covers and no timeline predicts.

The gap between finding the right person and becoming the couple who acts is not a logistics problem. It is an identity problem. A couple who has discussed the lifestyle is still, structurally, the same couple they were before. A couple who calls the number crosses into a different category. That threshold is where many searches quietly stall — not because the candidate was wrong, but because the couple has not yet decided to become the people who follow through.

What follows is an anonymous account from Wes, 38, a commercial pest control technician in Dayton, Ohio. He and Claire, his wife of eleven years, found a bull in under two weeks. Then they sat on his contact card for three months. His account describes what happens after the search succeeds and the silence that nobody writes guides for. Edited for length but not for voice.

***

The contact card sat in my phone for ninety-one days. I know because Claire counted. She counts everything. Court reporters do that — her whole job is getting the right words in the right order on the right timeline, so when she told me it had been ninety-one days since Marcus gave us his number, I did not argue the math.

***

We have been married eleven years. Met in college, which is the boring version, so here is the real one: I was treating her dorm's basement for roaches and she was the only person who stayed to watch me work. She said she wanted to see if they were the big kind or the small kind. I told her the small kind were actually worse. She sat on a folding chair and asked me questions about insect behavior for twenty minutes, and three days later I took her to a steak place that was too expensive for what I was making. She ordered a salad and I thought, well, at least I can afford this. Then she changed her mind and got the ribeye and I liked her more for it.

Dayton is not an exciting city. We are not exciting people. I do commercial routes now — restaurants, warehouses, a couple of office parks that keep signing the contract because I show up on time and explain things without jargon. Claire does depositions for a firm downtown. We have a dog named Meatball and a house that needs new gutters and a marriage that most of our friends would probably describe as solid, which is the word people use when they mean not interesting enough to gossip about.

Saturdays we go to the hardware store, walk the dog, cook something that takes too long. Sundays we do yard work until it gets hot and then watch whatever true-crime thing Claire has queued up. I am giving you this level of detail because I want you to understand that we are not people who do dramatic things. The most dramatic thing I had done in 2024 was switch from Folgers to a local roaster.

The lifestyle thing started with a podcast. She was driving back from a deposition in Columbus — long drive, bad radio — and she hit play on an episode about ethical non-monogamy. She told me about it that night while I was hanging a shelf in the garage. I said "huh" and kept drilling. That is my move when I need time to think about something without admitting I need time.

***

Three weeks later I brought it up. Not the podcast. The idea. We were eating frozen pizza at the counter and I said, "That thing you listened to on the drive. Have you thought about it since?"

Claire put her fork down. She never stops eating for a question that does not matter. "Every day," she said. "Have you?"

I had. More than I wanted to admit. Not the logistics — I did not care about logistics yet. The idea itself. The image of her with someone else and it being something we chose together, something that belonged to our marriage instead of threatening it. I could not explain the appeal any better than that. I still cannot. It was there the way a preference is there. Like how some people want the window seat and some want the aisle. You do not arrive at it through argument.

We started looking. Claire made a profile on a lifestyle app. We screened together — her reading the messages, me reading her face while she read the messages. Within eleven days we had a phone call with a guy named Marcus who lived forty minutes south. Software consultant. Divorced, no kids. He asked about our marriage before he asked about our boundaries, which Claire said afterward was the thing that made her trust him.

The call lasted fifty minutes. He was calm. Honest about what he was looking for, honest about what he was not. He did not push. He did not sell himself. When we hung up Claire looked at me and said, "He checks every box."

She was right. And then we did absolutely nothing for ninety-one days.

***

The first week I told myself we were processing. The second week I told myself we were being responsible. By the third I was doing what I do at work when a job makes me nervous, which is find reasons to reschedule it. The restaurant has a grease-trap issue that needs attention first. The office park has a warranty walk coming up. There is always a reason not to go somewhere if you are willing to look hard enough.

Claire brought it up in week four. "Should we call Marcus back?" I said yes, absolutely. Neither of us picked up the phone. We went to my sister's birthday party instead and talked about kitchen tile for forty-five minutes.

Week six I almost called. I had his contact open and my thumb over the button and Meatball threw up on the rug and I took care of the dog instead. I told myself the timing was bad. The timing was fine. The dog was fine in thirty seconds.

In my line of work there is a concept called a harborage area. It is a crack, a gap, a warm space behind a wall where things live because nobody has opened it up and dealt with what is in there. You can treat the visible surfaces all day long. You can spray every baseboard and seal every gap you can see. But the colony is in the harborage, and it does not leave until you open the wall.

Marcus's phone number was not the problem. The harborage was somewhere behind it. What I was not admitting — what I did not understand until I was spraying a loading dock in Hamilton at five-thirty in the morning with nothing to distract me — was this: as long as we were the couple who talked about the lifestyle, we were still the people we had always been. The moment we called Marcus, we became somebody else. And I did not know who that was.

I am a guy who shows up on time and does not leave surprises behind the walls. I follow the protocols. I document what I spray, where I spray it, and what I find. There is no version of my working life where I open a wall without knowing what is inside. This was a wall. I had no idea.

Claire figured it out before I did. She always does. One night she was eating cereal at the counter, not looking up, and she said, "You are not protecting us. You are stalling."

I said she was right.

"I know. Call him tomorrow."

***

Marcus answered like no time had passed. Not a trace of irritation. He said, "Hey, Wes. I was hoping you two would reach out again." It was not a line. It was just true. And the fact that he had waited three months without sending a single follow-up text — no nudge, no check-in, no "just making sure you got my message" — told me more about who he was than the original phone call did.

We met for coffee on Saturday. A place near the bike trail with good light and bad pastries. Marcus wore a flannel and ordered a drip coffee and shook my hand the way a person shakes your hand when they actually mean it. Not squeezing. Not performing. Just: I am here, you are here, let us see.

He asked Claire about court reporting like he wanted to know. Not polite curiosity — actual questions about the stenography machine, how fast she types, whether she ever gets emotional during testimony. She told him about the custody case that made her cry in the bathroom and he listened without trying to fix it. Then he asked me about pest control and I told him about the harborage concept and he laughed and said, "That is a metaphor for half the things in my life." Claire laughed too. A real one.

Two weeks later we had dinner. Then the evening happened.

I am not going to walk you through it. Not because it was private, though it was. Because the evening was not the point. The evening was the thing I had spent ninety-one days building into a wall, and when I finally opened it, what was behind it was not the catastrophe I had been bracing for. It was just a room. A normal room with normal people in it being honest with each other.

What I remember most clearly is the next morning. Claire made eggs. I fed Meatball. We sat at the counter and she said, "Are you okay?" I said, "Yeah. I am good." And I meant it in a way I had not meant anything in a while. Not performing fine. Just being fine. Accurately.

She told me I seemed lighter. I think what she meant was that the ninety-one days of carrying a decision I refused to make had been heavier than the decision itself. The version of me she saw that morning was the one who had finally set it down.

Marcus texted that afternoon. Not to recap the evening. To say thank you — for trusting him with it. I read the message standing in my truck at a job site and I thought: I spent three months convinced I was going to turn into somebody I did not recognize, and what I turned into was the same guy standing in the same truck at the same parking lot. Just lighter. Like she said.

We have seen Marcus three times since. It is still new. I do not know what it becomes. But I know this: the search took eleven days. The hard part was the ninety-one where I pretended I was not ready for something I had been ready for since the frozen pizza.

***

The search for a bull is typically narrated as an outbound problem: where to look, how to vet, which red flags to screen for. Wes and Claire's story inverts the difficulty. The search was the simplest phase. What followed was a three-month silence between finding the right person and becoming the couple who acts — a gap that no guide covers because it does not look like a problem from the outside.

Platforms like VEX exist because the space between a first conversation and a trusted connection is where most searches lose momentum. Verification and couple-first architecture reduce the friction that lives in the infrastructure. What they cannot reduce is the friction that lives inside the couple. That threshold is crossed only when both people decide to step through it. Wes learned what many couples learn: the weight of standing at the door is almost always heavier than what is on the other side.

Enter the garden.

Available on iOS and Android.